EU Explanation of Vote – United Nations 3rd Committee: Combating defamation of religions

Mr. Chairperson,

I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union to explain our position on the draft resolution contained in document L.27, entitled “Defamation of Religions”.

The European Union would like to reiterate its strong belief in tolerance, non-discrimination, freedom of expression, freedom of thought and freedom of religion or belief. We are convinced that a continuing dialogue on these issues can help us to overcome existing gaps in perceptions, concepts and ideas.

We share the concerns of the OIC that persons all over the world are victimised because of their religion or belief. We all need to do more to eliminate religious intolerance, and to ensure that those who incite hatred or violence against other individuals, due to their religion or belief, are dealt with by the law.

The EU can, however, not agree with an approach that promotes the concept of defamation of religions as a response. The concept of defamation of religions severely limits freedom of expression and puts in danger the very openness and tolerance that allows people of different faiths to co-exist and practise their faiths without fear. It is fundamental to distinguish between criticism of religions or beliefs and incitement to religious hatred.

The EU firmly believes that the concept of defamation of religions is inconsistent with human rights law. International human rights law protects individuals in the exercise of their freedoms and does not and should not protect religions or beliefs systems as such. Also the High Commissioner, as well as a number of Special Rapporteurs, have called for anchoring this debate in the existing international legal framework provided by the ICCPR.

Mr. Chairperson,

The EU recognizes that there are legitimate concerns that the resolution seeks to address. The EU condemns instances of discrimination and intolerance against any individual on the grounds of religion or belief. The EU has publicly expressed strong resolve to fight these phenomena. We are very open and transparent about the challenges that we encounter in this field. We invite others to show a similar openness and determination to combat all forms of religious intolerance. For one thing is clear: the problem of religious intolerance is worldwide and not limited to certain regions or certain religions or beliefs. Followers of all religions and beliefs, as well as non-believers, can be victims of human rights violations. Any list of victims can only be exclusive.

Mr. Chairperson,

Let me reiterate that the EU is willing to engage in a constructive, serious dialogue with the OIC and other interested parties to explain our concerns, with the aim to increase mutual understanding, and finding new ways to address the concerns the sponsors of this resolution seek to address. We will continue to support initiatives that can contribute to a comprehensive dialogue, grounded in international law, and taking into account the views and concerns of all member states.

Mr. Chairperson,

For all these reasons, the EU is calling for a vote on L.27 and will vote against the text.

Thank you, Mr. Chairperson.

| Haut |

• EU Explanation of Vote – United Nations 3rd Committee: Globalization and its impact on the full enjoyment of all human rights (12/11/2009)
• EU Explanation of Vote – United Nations 3rd Committee: Equitable geographical distribution in the membership of the human rights treaty bodies (12/11/2009)
• EU Presidency Statement – United Nations 3rd Committee: Elimination of Racism (2/11/2009)